LightBlog

samedi 11 juin 2022

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Review: Fantastic at everything, except selfies

ZTE has been working on its under-display camera tech for quite a while now, with the ZTE Axon 20 5G being one of the first commercial devices to pack one. Back then it wasn’t great — the pixel density over the camera was incredibly low and stood out like a sore thumb, and the picture quality itself wasn’t very good. Now, two generations later with the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, the company has improved on its under-display cameras a whole lot.

However, even without the headlining feature of an under-display camera, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a fantastic phone in its own right. The flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset alongside the Full HD 6.8-inch panel makes it a premium experience, and the build quality of the phone is excellent in the hand. Even better is the fact that the display is completely unimpeded by any kind of notch or punch hole, making it an excellent smartphone for media consumption.

Is the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra worth your money, though? It’s hard to say. If you find yourself taking selfies more than once a month, then it’s best to give it a pass. Alternatively, if it’s rare you take a selfie but you want it to be the best possible quality when you do, then you should still pass. If selfies don’t matter to you, though, then read on. This may be the phone for you.

    ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
    The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has an under-display camera that doesn't do a great job, but stays well hidden. It packs other flagship specs too that help it contend as a top smartphone.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:


ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: Specifications

Specification ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Dimensions & Weight
  • 163.28mm × 73.56mm × 8.41mm
  • 204grams
Display
  • 6.8-inch AMOLED
  • Full HD+  (2480 x 1110)
  • 360Hz touch sampling rate
  • 1500nits
  • 100% DCI-P3 wide color gamut coverage
SoC
  • Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
    • 1x ARM Cortex-X2 @ 3.0GHz
    • 3x ARM Cortex-A710 @ 2.50GHz
    • 4x ARM Cortex-A510 @ 1.80GHz
  • Adreno 730 GPU
RAM & Storage
  • 8GB/12GB LPDDR5 RAM
  • 128GB/256GB UFS 3.1 storage
Battery & Charging
  • 5,000mAh battery
  • 65W fast charging support
Security In-display optical fingerprint scanner
Rear Camera(s)
  • Primary: 64MP IMX787
    • 16mm equivalent focal length
    • Wide angle and macro 2-in-1
    • 4cm AF micro
    • Free form surface with low distortion
    • f/2.35
  • Secondary: 64MP IMX787 ultra-wide
    • 35mm equivalent focal length
    • OIS
    • f/1.6
  • Tertiary: 64MP telephoto
    • 91mm equivalent focal length
    • 5.7x optical zoom
    • f/3.5
    • OIS
Front Camera(s)
  • 16MP under display
Port(s)
  • USB Type-C
Audio
  • Dual stereo speakers
Connectivity
  • Wi-Fi 6E
  • 5G NR
  • NFC
  • GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo
  • Stereo speakers
Software ZTE MyOS based on Android 12
Colors
  • Black

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: Band support

  • For Europe:
    • NR: n78/1/3/5/7/28/38/40/41
    • FDD: B1/3/5/7/8/20/28
    • TDD: 38/40/41 UMTS:B1/2/5/8
    • GSM: B2/3/5/8
  • For non-Europe:
    • NR: n77/78/1/2/3/5/7/28/38/40/41/66
    • FDD: B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/20/28/66
    • TDD: 38/40/41 UMTS:B1/2/4/5/8
    • GSM: B2/3/5/8

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: Design

  • Beautiful design
  • Big camera array
  • Completely unimpeded display

Front of the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra packs an incredibly premium design, with thin bezels and a soft-touch glass back that sparkles under specific lighting conditions. It feels good in the hand and the camera island on the back packs three equally-sized sensors, along with additional camera branding. Finally, the “ZTE” insignia is emblazoned on the bottom.

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra packs an incredibly premium design

The front of the phone is equally premium. The large 6.8-inch panel goes edge to edge thanks to the waterfall display, and the corners have such a small radius that it doesn’t quite look like they’re curved. It basically looks like a recent Samsung Galaxy Note/S22 Ultra, or a Google Pixel 6 Pro.

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra camera module

The best part of the front is how completely undetectable the under-display selfie camera is. It’s way harder to see this time around, and it’s very easy to forget that it’s even there. Watching Netflix, YouTube, and just using my phone is extremely nice thanks to it. It’s something I missed from the likes of the OnePlus 7 Pro with its pop-up camera, and while the Axon 20 nearly scratched that itch for me, the low pixel density around the camera ruined it.

When it comes to pixel density, I was worried that the Full HD panel would be poor on this size display, but I was wrong. It looks good and is barely noticeable when just using your phone — though I still wish it had a Quad HD display. I do wonder if the lower pixel density of the Full HD panel is helpful for the camera, as it would explain why an otherwise super-flagship phone only has a 1080p display.

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra under display camera

Focusing on that under-display camera itself, it’s possible to see it, but only in specific lighting and only when tilting the phone a certain way. It’s much harder to catch it, and you won’t really ever spot it when looking at it head-on. It’s a big improvement from the company’s past devices that packed this camera system, as you’ll nearly never see it. Even in the above photo, you need to look hard for it. Here’s a tip: look directly beside the Google News notification icon.


ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: Cameras

  • Completely “meh” front camera
  • Decent back cameras

Selfie camera

Selfie with ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Selfie with ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

While the selfie camera on the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is better hidden than ever before, it’s hard to say that it’s actually improved by much. It still looks “soft” in how it smoothens out photos, and it struggles with any strong light sources. When in direct light, any light sources shown in the viewfinder will bloom heavily and destroy the photo quality entirely. “Bloom” in photographs refers to the halo-like effect which is visible around light sources in photos and is a problem in particular on under-display cameras.

If you want to get a phone where you know you'll be taking a lot of selfies, then stay away from this one

The reason for the poor selfie quality is because it’s as if you were trying to take a photo through a window — which is literally what’s happening, except it’s through your phone screen. If you want to get a phone where you know you’ll be taking a lot of selfies, then I suggest staying away from this one. I would never use this phone camera for taking selfies with friends and family, but I can see it being used sometimes for video calls and the like.

All in all, this feels very similar to the selfie camera on both the ZTE Axon 20 and the ZTE Axon 30. The company has gotten better at hiding its under-display cameras for sure, but I’m not sure I can say they’ve improved the quality all that much.

Back cameras

The back cameras on the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, however, are actually quite decent. I’ve used better across a ton of other devices, but they still do a good job at providing consistent quality across all three lenses as they maintain great hardware for all three rear cameras. I’m a big fan of the versatility, as it doesn’t feel like I’m downgrading just because I switch to another sensor. All three punch at about the same level, which is an often overlooked aspect of smartphone cameras.

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

Shooting with the primary camera on this phone feels a little bit zoomed in, and that’s thanks to the 35mm equivalent focal length. ZTE says it allows for better photos, but the problem is that it can just be annoying to shoot with as it means you need to back up from your subject even more when taking a photo.


Performance

  • Typical Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 heat vs. performance challenges
  • Interesting throttling performance

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is the latest flagship chipset from Qualcomm, and it’s the basis of pretty much every flagship phone we’ve seen released so far. It’s a powerful chip, though we’ve consistently seen manufacturers struggling to tame it and the heat that it generates. ZTE is no different in that regard, as the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra manages to strike a balance between power consumption and performance. There are some missteps, but overall, it’s a very decent implementation.

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra manages to strike a balance between power consumption and performance

First and foremost, it’s important to mention that yes, at times, the phone can indeed end up feeling slow or laggy. I especially notice it when unlocking my phone, though the same can occasionally happen when opening the camera app too. I also came across this on the Honor Magic 4 Pro, and I think it’s a result of throttling the chipset. Cameras are pretty hefty on the software computational side, and it would make sense that it might struggle if the chip is being throttled.

The results obtained through CPU Throttling Test and Geekbench 5 are representative of what the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can achieve though. I found it interesting when running CPU Throttling Test, as it started off quite poor, and picked up pace over the course of five minutes or so. It would spike up then back down, getting slightly higher on some spikes than others.

This behavior was consistent across multiple runs, and I believe there may be some clever process scheduling going on to try and figure out if an application requires consistent additional resources. I’ve never seen this behavior when running this test before, but it’s interesting to see and just might be a unique approach to dealing with this chipset.


Battery and charging

  • Uses 65W Power delivery charger included in the box
  • Charges to full in ~40 minutes

The battery life on the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has been quite impressive, and that may be because of how ZTE is handling the chipset. I was achieving anywhere between four and six hours of screen on time when using my smartphone, with the higher-end of that spectrum seemingly being nearly unachievable with this generation of flagship phones.

That 5,000 mAh battery in the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra can be charged at 65W with the included charger in the box, and that charger also supports USB Power Delivery with PPS. That means not only can you fast charge your phone, but you can also use it to fast charge other devices too like the Nintendo Switch or the Samsung Galaxy S22 series. Plenty of gadgets use Power Delivery and even more are going to thanks to the European Union, so it’s likely this will end up being one of the best USB PD chargers.

As for charging speed, I’ve found that the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra charges generally in around 40 minutes, which is pretty stellar for any smartphone. I don’t have any complaints in that department.


ZTE’s MyOS isn’t great

  • It has a really nice implementation of Android 12.
  • Aggressive background task killing and delayed notifications hold it back.
  • ZTE’s longer-term update track record is abysmal.

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra comes with MyOS based on Android 12, and it has a few good ideas that set it aside from the rest of the crowd. Spoiler, I really wanted to like it. It’s a unique flavor of Android with some good ideas, and as far as Android variants go, it’s certainly not the worst that I’ve used. Nevertheless, it has quite a few problems. I’ll start with what I like first, though.

Looks-wise, it actually retains quite a lot of the Android 12 look and feel. It has four large toggles at the top, and pulling down the notification shade to its next level will show additional toggles. You can also create a customizable always-on display, modify your lock screen, and change a lot about the launcher, too. From a usability perspective, the launcher is one of the best I’ve used that’s come preloaded on a smartphone. It has an app drawer that you can scroll through alphabetically on the left-hand side, and there are a few personalization options too, including animation choices.

Now, some of the stuff I don’t like that’s incredibly frustrating. For starters, the notification center itself feels incredibly disjointed. Even in the screenshots above, you can see how “Device controls” is almost long enough to extend outside of the bubble. The icons below quick settings feel jumbled and confusing. I’ve also found that when I’m listening to music, it doesn’t anchor Spotify or YouTube to the top of my notifications like Android is supposed to. It’s treated as any other notification and thrown somewhere in the rest of the pile.

When it comes to notifications, I just don't get a lot of them

Not only that, but when it comes to notifications, I just don’t get a lot of them. The worst offender is Slack, where for some reason, they come in delayed. I don’t mean delayed as in they take a few minutes to arrive but if I open the app they arrive instantly, I mean delayed. I can get a message from a colleague on Slack, reply to it on my phone, and then close the app and get a notification minutes later. It’s a behavior I have only ever experienced one other time, and that was with the OnePlus Nord 2. It’s also particularly overzealous at killing apps in the background, with it taking several minutes at a time to get Facebook Messenger notifications.

MyOS is so close to being a really good Android variant, and so far, I’m mostly enjoying it. As well, while the company hasn’t been known for its commitment to software updates, I’ve already received three updates throughout the review period. They’ll almost certainly taper off, but I’m hopeful that ZTE may stay on top of things a bit more this time around versus the company’s previous attempts at updating its own flagships. For context, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra from last year is only now starting to get a stable Android 12 build… in China. Don’t buy this phone for the update promise, albeit we stay hopeful for a turnaround.


ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: Miscellaneous

Signal strength

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has no problem holding a signal pretty much wherever I am. I get VoLTE too for high-definition calls, though I can’t get Wi-Fi calling working for whatever reason.

Speakers

The speakers are loud, but not the loudest that I’ve used. They’re a pair of dual speakers with the top-firing speaker being quieter than the bottom-firing. They get the job done and are your typical smartphone speakers, so you know what to expect here.

Vibration motor

The vibration motor on the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is pretty good, and the haptic feedback feels good when typing. I’ve missed a few notifications on occasion when it’s in my pocket, but not often enough that I think it’s a weak motor.

Bootloader and kernel sources

The kernel source for the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is currently available on ZTE’s own website. As for bootloader unlocking, it’s currently not officially possible.

Box contents

  • Phone (duh)
  • 65W charging brick
  • USB-C to USB-C cable
  • Basic case

Should you buy the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a phone with a lot of compromises, but it’s aimed at a very specific type of user. If you don’t care about the selfie camera, it’s probably already high up on your list thanks to that stellar display. Coming in at €829 though, it’s a pretty tall ask when there are smartphones with a lot of the same features and better cameras for a lot cheaper.

For example, in Europe, you can save €80 and get the Realme GT 2 Pro, a phone that honestly offers a lot more. You get a longer support window, much better cameras, the same charging speed, better software, and a much nicer QHD+ LTPO display. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra’s best selling point is the display, but even that a lot of people likely won’t care about and falters behind the display tech of a cheaper phone. A friend of mine saw the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and thought it was cool, but pointed out that the front-facing camera on their phone doesn’t bother them because it’s in the center of the status bar anyway. To be honest, I completely see where they’re coming from.

Do consumers really care that much about punch-hole cameras?

It’s great to see ZTE spearheading under-display camera technology, but I don’t know how much consumers care. While photos and videos still look awful, most people won’t care if they get a few pixels back on their phone’s display. I like it for viewing content, but the trade-off isn’t worth it. Just like small phones, the demand is there for a very niche userbase, but time and time again it’s been shown that people overall prefer the versatility of a larger phone. The same can be said here about the front-facing camera.

Is this phone worthy of the “Ultra” tagline, then? I think despite the flaws in its camera system, I think so. ZTE has crafted a magnificent smartphone here, even if it’s not the best of the best that you can get. I like it and you probably will too, but the price tag is something that you’ll need to weigh up against the competition to see if it’s really worth your money.

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is available in the following regions, at $799/829 euros/709 pounds.

  • North America: Canada, United States (56 of 62 states. American Samoa, Guam, Hawaii, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands not included)
  • Europe: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain(50 of 52 provinces), Sweden, United Kingdom
  • Middle East: Israel, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates
  • Asia Pacific: Australia, Hong Kong SAR, Indonesia, Japan, Macao SAR, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Thailand, Vietnam
  • Africa: South Africa (8 of 9 provinces)
    ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
    The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has an under-display camera that doesn't do a great job, but stays well hidden. It packs other flagship specs too that help it contend as a top smartphone.

The post ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Review: Fantastic at everything, except selfies appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/nzEHFJv
via IFTTT

vendredi 10 juin 2022

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S21: Which phone to buy?

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G offers a great value for money for anyone trying to spend less than $500 on a new phone in the US. It’s got a good design overall, an impressive display, reliable performance, and a decent set of cameras for the price. Samsung is also making some big promises on the software side, which is great. All of this really makes the Galaxy A53 5G one of the best Android values in the mid-range segment in the US. But how does it sack up against some of the older flagships? Let’s take a quick look at the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S21 to find out which phone is better in 2022.

The Galaxy S21 may not be the latest phone in Samsung’s flagship lineup, but it’s still a great phone with a speedy Snapdragon 888/Exynos 2100 chipset and a couple of major Android OS updates left. It may not be readily available on the market like the Galaxy A53 5G, but you can still buy it from many reliable retailers and major carriers in the US, and you’ll even get a great deal on pre-owned units. But is it even worth considering in 2022? Or should you pick up a mid-ranger like the Galaxy A53 5G instead? Let’s find out.

Navigate this article:

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S21: Specifications

Let’s take a quick look at the specifications to see what each of these devices brings to the table:

Specification Samsung Galaxy A53 5G Samsung Galaxy S21
Build
  • Plastic body
  • Gorilla Glass 5 front panel
  • IP67 water/dust resistance
  • Aluminum mid-frame
  • Plastic back
  • Gorilla Glass Victus front
  • IP68 water resistance
Dimensions & Weight
  • 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1mm
  • 189 g
  • 151.7 x 71.2 x 7.9 mm
  • 171 grams
Display
  • 6.5-inch Super AMOLED
  • 120Hz refresh rate
  • Infinity-O display
  • 6.2″ FHD+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X flat display
  • 120Hz variable refresh rate
  • 48-120Hz
  • HDR10+
  • 1300nits peak brightness
  • Always-On display
  • Infinity-O display
SoC
  • Samsung Exynos 1280
  • International: Exynos 2100:
    • 1x ARM Cortex X1 @ 2.9GHz +
    • 3x ARM Cortex A78 Cores @ 2.8GHz +
    • 4x ARM Cortex A55 Cores @ 2.2GHz
  • USA: Qualcomm Snapdragon 888:
    • 1x Kryo 680 Prime Core @ 2.84GHz
    • 3x Kryo 680 Performance Cores @ 2.4GHz
    • 4x Kryo 680 Efficiency Cores @ 1.8GHz
RAM & Storage
  • 6GB/8GB RAM
  • 128GB/256GB internal storage
  • microSD card slot (up to 1TB)
  • 8GB LPDDR5 + 128GB
  • 8GB + 256GB
Battery & Charging
  • 5,000mAh battery
  • 25W Super Fast Charging
  •  No charger included
  • 4,000mAh
  • 25W USB Power Delivery 3.0 fast charging
  • 15W wireless charging
  • 4.5 reverse wireless charging
  • No charger in the box in most regions
Security Fingerprint sensor Ultrasonic In-Display Fingerprint Scanner
Rear Camera(s)
  • 64MP f/1.8 Main (with OIS)
  • 12MP f/2.2 Ultra-wide
  • 5MP f/2.4 Depth sensor
  • 5MP f/2.4 Macro
  • Primary: 12MP, wide-angle lens, f/1.8, 1/1.76″, 1.8µm, OIS, Dual Pixel AF
  • Secondary: 12MP, ultra-wide-angle lens, f/2.2, 120° FoV, 1/2.55″, 1.4µm, Fixed Focus
  • Tertiary: 64MP, telephoto lens, f/2.0, 1/1.76″, 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
Front Camera(s) 32MP f/2.2 10MP, f/2.2, 1.22µm, 80° FoV, Dual Pixel AF
Port(s)
  • USB Type-C
  • No headphone jack
  • USB 3.2 Type-C
Audio
  • Stereo speakers
  • Stereo speakers by AKG
  • Dolby Atmos
Connectivity
  • 5G
  • LTE
  • Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (2.4G+5GHz)
  • Bluetooth 5.1
  • Bluetooth 5.1
  • NFC
  • Wi-Fi 6
  • 5G
Software One UI 4.1 (Android 12)  Samsung One UI 3.1 based on Android 11
Other Features
  • Four years of major OS upgrades
  • Five years of security updates
  • ANT+
  • Samsung DeX
  • Knox

Looking at the specifications table, it’s safe to say that the Galaxy A53 5G stacks up pretty well against the Galaxy S21 on paper. There are some noteworthy differences between the two that make one look better than the other, but it’s mostly the Galaxy A53 5G that seems to have an edge over the Galaxy S21 in many areas including the display, battery, camera, and more.

Design and build quality

Galaxy A53's all screen design.

Visually, both the Galaxy A53 5G and the Galaxy S21 look like any other modern phone in 2022. The Galaxy S21 has metal rails that flow into the camera bump on the back, similar to the more expensive Galaxy S21 Ultra. It is, however, worth pointing out that the company has swapped out the usual rear glass panel with plastic for the S21. It’s not necessarily a deal-breaker because it still looks and feels great. The Galaxy A53 5G, on the other hand, has a slightly different back design with the camera bump melting into the body of the phone. The A53 5G also uses plastic for both the back panel as well as the frame but is surprisingly still heavier than the Galaxy S21. It weighs 189 grams whereas the S21 weighs 171 grams.

Galaxy A53

The Galaxy S21 is also thinner and has a small form factor overall when compared with the A53 5G. The S21 measures 7.9 mm in thickness while the A53 5G measures 8.1 mm. The Galaxy S21 is also shorter as it features a smaller display on the front. Both phones have Gorilla Glass to protect the display but the Galaxy A53 5G is using Gorilla Glass 5 and the Galaxy S21 is using Gorilla Glass Victus. The Gorilla Glass Victus is said to be slightly better in terms of durability but we recommend picking up either a case or at least a screen protector for both phones. It’s glass, at the end of the day, which is bound to break or get scratched if/when it takes a significant hit. You can check out our collection of the best Galaxy S21 cases and the Galaxy A53 5G cases to find some good options.

The Galaxy S21 in purple

The Galaxy S21 is also slightly superior when it comes to overall durability as it has an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance. The A53 5G isn’t too far behind with its IP67 rating, so it’s safe to say that both phones can handle the occasional splashes of water and exposure to minor dust particles. One thing we really like about the Galaxy A53 5G is that it supports expandable storage via a microSD card. It features a hybrid slot that lets you either add a secondary SIM card or a microSD card. The Galaxy S21 lacks the support for expandable storage which means you’ll have to stick with the storage variant you buy. Both devices, however, lack a headphone jack, which is more disappointing in the A53 5G as people still miss having this feature in the budget space.

Display

As far as the display is concerned, the Galaxy A53 5G features a bigger panel compared to the S21. We’re looking at a 6.5-inch Super AMOLED for the Galaxy A53 5G versus a 6.2-inch FHD+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X for the Galaxy S21. It may be smaller but the Galaxy S21’s panel comes with support for variable refresh rates while the Galaxy A53 5G’s display doesn’t.  The Galaxy S21’s Dynamic AMOLED 2X display can go from 48Hz to 120Hz based on the content being displayed on the phone. That should help the S21 in the battery department, which we’ll discuss a bit later in this article.

Galaxy A53 display.

The display on both phones, as you can see, comes with a center-aligned punch hole camera on the front. The bezels are ever-so-slightly bigger on the Galaxy A53 5G, but that’s not going to bother you unless you compare them side-by-side. Both phones are rocking an AMOLED panel, so we doubt if you’ll notice any significant difference between the two in terms of quality too. Both panels also support a maximum screen resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, which means the pixels-per-inch (PPI) count is going to be higher in the case of the S21 due to the smaller physical size. That being said, they should be virtually indistinguishable when it comes to the overall sharpness. You also get an in-display fingerprint scanner on both devices, so no differences there either.

Internal hardware

On the inside, the Galaxy A53 5G is rocking Samsung’s in-house Exynos 1280 chipset. It’s an octa-core chip with performance-oriented Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4GHz and power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores running at 2GHz. This chipset is the same for all models of the Galaxy A53 5G, regardless of the region you purchase it in. The Galaxy S21, on the other hand, is powered by the Snapdragon 888 in the US and the Exynos 2100 in other regions. Both the Snapdragon 888 and the Exynos 2100 are octa-core chips. The Snapdragon 888 packs an X1 core clocked at the traditional 2.84GHz along with three A78 performance cores running at 2.40GHz and four A55 energy-efficient cores running at 1.80GHz. The Exynos 2100, on the other hand, also comes with an X1 core clocked at 2.9GHz, three Cortex-A78 cores running at 2.8 GHz, and four A55 cores running at 2.2 GHz.

Are those chips better than the Exynos 1280 that’s inside the A53 5G? If you care about the benchmark numbers, then yes. The Exynos 1280 is probably not going to keep up with both the Snapdragon 888 and the Exynos 2100 on paper. That being said, the Exynos 1280 is perfectly viable for day-to-day usage. In fact, most modern phones, including mid-range devices are capable of pushing through basic day-to-day workloads with ease. So this comes down to a personal preference, and whether or not you’re willing to trade the flagship chipset for an affordable price tag. All these phones, however, support 5G, so no differences there whatsoever.

The base variant of the Galaxy A53 5G comes with 6GB of memory and 128GB of storage. The Galaxy S21’s base variant is slightly better as it offers 8GB of LPDDR5 RAM along with 128GB of storage. The A53 5G makes up for it with support for expandable storage. As we mentioned earlier, the mid-range phone in this comparison allows you to add up to 1TB of microSD card. Sadly, that’s not an option on the Galaxy S21 and you’re simply forced to spend more money for additional storage. Even then, you’re pretty much limited to just 256GB of storage, which may not be enough if you happen to take a lot of photos or record lots of 4K footage.

As far as the batteries are concerned, the Galaxy A53 5G packs a 5,000 mAh battery with support f0r 25W fast charging. The S21 falls a bit short in the battery department with a 4,000 mAh battery. It also supports 25W fast-charging, but the smaller battery is bound to run out of juice faster. It’s worth pointing out that the Dynamic AMOLED 2X with its variable refresh rate support might alleviate some of the battery pain but we doubt if it’ll do much to win over the A53 5G here. But for what it’s worth, the Galaxy S21 supports both wireless as well as reverse wireless charging, which is entirely missing on the Galaxy A53 5G. Speaking of charging, we’d like to make it clear that neither of the two is bundled with a charger inside the box, let alone the one capable of fast charging.

Camera

The camera is another area in which you’ll find some major differences between the Galaxy A53 5G and the Galaxy S21. For the A53 5G, we’re looking at a quad-camera setup that includes a 64MP main camera, 12MP ultra-wide, and a pair of 5MP sensors for macro and depth. The Galaxy S21 enters the fray with a triple-camera setup that includes a 12MP f/1.8 primary camera, a 12MP ultra-wide camera with f/2.2, and a 64MP f/2.0 telephoto lens. Only the primary 12MP and the tertiary telephoto lens feature OIS, though. The Galaxy A53 5G essentially trades the telephoto lens in favor of two 5MP sensors, each for macro and depth. As for the selfies, the Galaxy A53 5G sports a 32MP selfie shooter while the S21 sports a 10MP camera.

On paper, both phones offer a versatile camera system although the telephoto lens on the S21 is arguably more usable. That’s not to say the 5MP macro and depth sensors are pointless on the Galaxy A53 5G, though. They’re also capable of capturing some good photos that you’d otherwise miss out on, but we think the telephoto lens makes more sense practically in real-world usage. Unfortunately, we haven’t had a chance to take both of these phones for a photo walk together, so we don’t have side-by-side comparison shots. That being said, we’ll leave some camera samples captured on both phones below, so be sure to check them out while you’re here. On the video front, the Galaxy S21 beats the A53 5G with its support for up to 4K recording at 60fps. The Galaxy A53 5G tops out at 4K @30fps using the main camera, so keep that in mind.

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G camera samples

Galaxy A53, main camera Galaxy A53, main camera Galaxy A53, ultra-wide Galaxy A53, main camera Galaxy A53, selfie camera

Samsung Galaxy S21 camera samples

Galaxy S21 Galaxy S21 Galaxy S21 Galaxy S21 (10x zoom)

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S21: Which one should you buy?

We think both devices have a lot of good things going for them. The Samsung Galaxy S21 has a smaller display but it supports variable refresh rates and has higher peak brightness, unlike the Galaxy A53 5G. It’s also powered by flagship chipsets, albeit a year old. You also get more memory with the base variant of the S21 compared to the A53 5G. It may not have the biggest battery out of the two but it comes with support for fast charging as well as wireless charging. We also think the camera setup on the Galaxy S21 is more practical to use as the telephoto lens is something you’ll probably use a lot more than the macro and the depth sensors.

However, the Galaxy A53 5G is also well-equipped in all the aforementioned areas. You still get a decently powerful and reliable Exynos 1280 chipset to handle your everyday workloads. It also makes up for having less memory on the base variant with support for expandable storage of up to 1TB, something which is entirely missing on the S21. The Galaxy A53 5G also packs a massive 5,000 mAh battery with support for fast charging. And as far as the cameras are concerned, we think the Galaxy A53 5G also captures some good images overall from all its camera sensors.

Contrary to what the specifications table suggests, we think both the Galaxy A53 5G and the Galaxy S21 hold their own across different areas of comparison. But if we were to pick one, then we’d go with the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G mainly because of the software support and pricing. The Galaxy S21, being a year old already, only has a couple of major Android OS updates remaining meaning the Galaxy A53 5G has longer software support. Samsung says it’ll support the mid-ranger with four years of major OS upgrades and five years of security updates. So not only are you getting a decent hardware package that stands tall against a flagship like S21, but you also get superior software support. Not to mention, it’s also readily available to purchase in the US and in many parts of the world, that too for a relatively cheaper price.

We think the Galaxy A53 5G for $450 is worth picking up over the Galaxy S21 in 2022. This is also because the Galaxy S21 isn’t readily available on the market right now. Samsung is only selling a certified refurbished version of the phone for $675 in the US at the time of writing this article. You can check out our Galaxy S21 deals page to catch some discounts right now, but it’s probably not going to drop below $600. In comparison, the $450 is an amazing price for the Galaxy A53 5G considering everything that it brings to the table. You can even visit our Galaxy A53 5G deals page to see if you can snag the phone for even less. But if you are hellbent on buying a Galaxy S flagship phone, then consider checking out either the Galaxy S21 FE or stretching your wings a little to grab a Galaxy S22 instead.

    Samsung Galaxy S21
    Last year's Galaxy S21 is still a great phone, with a speedy Snapdragon 888/Exynos 2100 chipset and two major Android OS updates left.
    Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
    The Galaxy A53 offers a modern design, large screen and battery at an affordable price

The post Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S21: Which phone to buy? appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/oGaAzSi
via IFTTT

Google’s Immersive Stream for Games powering Capcom’s new Resident Evil Village online demo

Google Immersive Stream for Games is the technology behind Google Stadia, but slowly also being used by other third-party partners. One of the most recent examples is AT&T, adding Control to their offering, but now there’s another. Capcom has launched an online demo of Resident Evil Village and, you guessed it, Immersive Stream for Games is behind it.

Resident Evil Village is already available on Google Stadia, but the new demo is a completely separate product. You go to Capcom’s website, hit the play button, and you’re straight into the game. Keyboard and mouse are supported as well as controller, though not the Google Stadia controller it seems.

Immersive Stream for Games, Google’s cloud gaming technology, powers both our Stadia gaming platform and publishers’ ability to deliver games directly to their players. And today, Immersive Stream for Games is supporting world-renowned publisher Capcom with their launch of a cloud demo for their award-winning survival horror game, Resident Evil Village.

Resident Evil Village demo using Google Immersive Stream for Games

The demo itself works really well, albeit capped at 1080p and without HDR, but it plays exactly as you would hope. Stadia already has a standalone demo of Resident Evil Village for its players to try out, but there’s a bigger picture play here. Imagine a future where you land on the website of a new or upcoming game and there’s a button that lets you try it instantly. All without leaving the browser. The ability to push a game in this manner has huge implications for discoverability and even just the future of game demos.

Google has been doing its own work on Stadia with demos, providing one-click access to play full versions of games for a limited time. There’s no technical reason why future partners couldn’t offer the same type of access directly either pre or post-launch. There’s a lot to be said for just being able to click a button and instantly try out a new game.

For Capcom, specifically, this is something of an experiment. Once the demo has been completed players are presented with ways to continue playing on supported platforms. In this case, it’s already on Stadia, but it doesn’t have to be. We don’t have AT&T’s Batman game, after all. But pushing Immersive Stream for Games to publishers such as Capcom certainly won’t hurt Stadia going forward, either.

Hit up the Resident Evil Village website to take it for a spin yourself.

Source: Google

The post Google’s Immersive Stream for Games powering Capcom’s new Resident Evil Village online demo appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/MkYhNzG
via IFTTT

WhatsApp rolls out larger groups with up to 512 participants

WhatsApp has gained a raft of features over the past few months, including iMessage-style emoji reactions, increased fie sharing limit, new voice note features, and more. But the Meta-owned messaging app is in no mood to slow down. The app is now increasing the group size limit from 256 people to 512 people.

WhatsApp announced last month that it was doubling the participant limit for groups. As spotted by WABetainfo, the change has now started rolling out to users with the latest beta update on Android, iOS, and the desktop. It’s measly compared to Telegram’s 200,000 participant limit. Nevertheless, it still represents a big improvement over the 256-member limit, so we’ll happily take it.

WhatsApp group member list

“One of the top requests we’ve consistently received is the option to add more people to a chat, so now we’re slowly rolling out the ability to add up to 512 people to a group,” wrote WhatsApp in its official announcement last month.

The ability to add up to 512 people to a group is rolling out widely with the latest version of WhatsApp beta. It arrives with WhatsApp beta version 2.22.12.10 on Android and version 22.12.0.70 on iOS. The feature is expected to soon arrive on the stable version of the app as well. If you want to try it out, you can sign up for the beta program here.

Larger groups come hot on the heels of WhatsApp increasing the file sharing limit to 2GB, which is now widely available on the stable channel. WhatsApp is also reportedly working on an edit button to let users make changes to sent messages.

What do you think about WhatsApp’s increased group size limit? Do you think it’s enough for most use cases? 

The post WhatsApp rolls out larger groups with up to 512 participants appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/XVWz05T
via IFTTT

Google’s Immersive Stream for Games powering Capcom’s new Resident Evil Village online demo

Google Immersive Stream for Games is the technology behind Google Stadia, but slowly also being used by other third-party partners. One of the most recent examples is AT&T, adding Control to their offering, but now there’s another. Capcom has launched an online demo of Resident Evil Village and, you guessed it, Immersive Stream for Games is behind it.

Resident Evil Village is already available on Google Stadia, but the new demo is a completely separate product. You go to Capcom’s website, hit the play button, and you’re straight into the game. Keyboard and mouse are supported as well as controller, though not the Google Stadia controller it seems.

Immersive Stream for Games, Google’s cloud gaming technology, powers both our Stadia gaming platform and publishers’ ability to deliver games directly to their players. And today, Immersive Stream for Games is supporting world-renowned publisher Capcom with their launch of a cloud demo for their award-winning survival horror game, Resident Evil Village.

Resident Evil Village demo using Google Immersive Stream for Games

The demo itself works really well, albeit capped at 1080p and without HDR, but it plays exactly as you would hope. Stadia already has a standalone demo of Resident Evil Village for its players to try out, but there’s a bigger picture play here. Imagine a future where you land on the website of a new or upcoming game and there’s a button that lets you try it instantly. All without leaving the browser. The ability to push a game in this manner has huge implications for discoverability and even just the future of game demos.

Google has been doing its own work on Stadia with demos, providing one-click access to play full versions of games for a limited time. There’s no technical reason why future partners couldn’t offer the same type of access directly either pre or post-launch. There’s a lot to be said for just being able to click a button and instantly try out a new game.

For Capcom, specifically, this is something of an experiment. Once the demo has been completed players are presented with ways to continue playing on supported platforms. In this case, it’s already on Stadia, but it doesn’t have to be. We don’t have AT&T’s Batman game, after all. But pushing Immersive Stream for Games to publishers such as Capcom certainly won’t hurt Stadia going forward, either.

Hit up the Resident Evil Village website to take it for a spin yourself.

Source: Google

The post Google’s Immersive Stream for Games powering Capcom’s new Resident Evil Village online demo appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/MkYhNzG
via IFTTT

Android 13 Beta 3 prompts users to review notification settings

Android 13 may not be as massive an update as Android 12 as far as visual changes are concerned, but it still brings forth many important improvements. One of the most notable changes in Android 13 is the new runtime permission model for notifications. In previous Android versions, apps could post notifications by default without requesting any permission. But that stops in Android 13. And to better educate users about this new change, Android 13 Beta 3 now prompts users to review their notifications settings.

Starting with Android 13 Beta 3, the Android System now gives users a heads up of the new runtime notification model. It also asks users to review their notification settings. This helps new users understand how notifications work in Android 13. Tapping on the notification takes the user to the “App notifications” page, where they can toggle on or off the notification permission for apps.

Starting in Android 13, apps that you install need your permission to send notifications. Tap to change this permission for existing apps.

It’s a minor change, but one that can go a long way in educating average users on new system-level changes that might otherwise not be readily apparent and lead to confusion.

Android 13 Beta 3 marks the first Platform Stability milestone, bringing us a step closer to the final release. All app-facing behavior and APIs are now final, and developers can start readying their apps for the stable release of Android 13. From this point forward, there won’t be any changes to the platform — most of the focus will be on improving performance and polishing. Interested users can try out Android 13 Beta 3 on a supported Pixel phone.

The post Android 13 Beta 3 prompts users to review notification settings appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/oCOhB4R
via IFTTT

Android 13 Beta 3 prompts users to review notification settings

Android 13 may not be as massive an update as Android 12 as far as visual changes are concerned, but it still brings forth many important improvements. One of the most notable changes in Android 13 is the new runtime permission model for notifications. In previous Android versions, apps could post notifications by default without requesting any permission. But that stops in Android 13. And to better educate users about this new change, Android 13 Beta 3 now prompts users to review their notifications settings.

Starting with Android 13 Beta 3, the Android System now gives users a heads up of the new runtime notification model. It also asks users to review their notification settings. This helps new users understand how notifications work in Android 13. Tapping on the notification takes the user to the “App notifications” page, where they can toggle on or off the notification permission for apps.

Starting in Android 13, apps that you install need your permission to send notifications. Tap to change this permission for existing apps.

It’s a minor change, but one that can go a long way in educating average users on new system-level changes that might otherwise not be readily apparent and lead to confusion.

Android 13 Beta 3 marks the first Platform Stability milestone, bringing us a step closer to the final release. All app-facing behavior and APIs are now final, and developers can start readying their apps for the stable release of Android 13. From this point forward, there won’t be any changes to the platform — most of the focus will be on improving performance and polishing. Interested users can try out Android 13 Beta 3 on a supported Pixel phone.

The post Android 13 Beta 3 prompts users to review notification settings appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/oCOhB4R
via IFTTT