LightBlog

dimanche 13 mars 2022

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max: The best of Android takes on the best of iOS

Samsung’s newest alpha dog phone, the Galaxy S22 Ultra is out. While we will compare this beast of a phone against all the top Android flagships, the first comparison that must be done is against Apple’s top offering, the iPhone 13 Pro Max. Because for as much as Google, Xiaomi, OPPO and others have made great phones, the reality is for a major chunk of the world, it’s still either Apple or Samsung when it comes time to pick a new phone.

The good news is, Apple and Samsung are fully aware other brands can make premium flagships too, so they have stepped up their game the past couple of years. No more outdated camera sensors, no more mediocre battery capacity compared to Chinese flagships. Apple and Samsung threw everything but the kitchen sink at the iPhone 13 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. Here’s how they stack up against each other after in-depth testing.

galaxy s22 ultra and iphone 13 pro max in the hand

    Galaxy S22 Ultra
    The Galaxy S22 Ultra is the best of the best right now in the Android space, with the best screen, the best zoom camera, and an S Pen to boot!
    Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
    The iPhone 13 Pro Max is the biggest and baddest Apple has to offer in the mobile space. It's got the most powerful mobile SoC in the world and impressive cameras.

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max: Specifications

Specifications Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Build
  • Aluminum mid-frame
  • Gorilla Glass Victus back
  • Gorilla Glass Victus front
  • Stainless steel mid-frame
  • Glass back
  • Ceramic Shield glass front
Dimensions & Weight
  • 163.3 x 77.9 x 8.9mm
  • 229 grams
  • 160.8mm x 78.1mm x 7.65mm
  • 240g
Display
  • 6.8-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X curved display
  • Variable refresh rate up between 1Hz to 120Hz
  • 6.7-inch Super Retina XDR OLED
  • ProMotion refresh rate between 10Hz and 120Hz
SoC
  • International: Exynos 2200
  • US, China, India, among others: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  • Apple A15 Bionic
RAM & Storage
  • 8GB/12GB RAM
  • 128GB/256GB/512GB/1TB
  • 6GB
  • 128GB/256GB/512GB/1TB
Battery & Charging
  • 5,000mAh
  • 45W USB Power Delivery 3.0 fast charging
  • 15W wireless charging
  • 4.5 reverse wireless charging
  • No charger in box in most regions
  • 4,373mAh
  • 20W wired fast charging
  • 7.5W wireless charging
  • 15W MagSafe wireless charging
  • No charger in box in most regions
Security Ultrasonic in-Display fingerprint scanner Face ID
Rear Camera(s)
  • Primary: 108MP wide, f/1.8, 1/1.33″, OIS, Laser AF
  • Secondary: 12MP ultra-wide, f/2.2
  • Tertiary: 10MP telephoto, 3x optical zoom, f/2.4
  • Quarternary: 10MP, Periscope, 10x optical zoom, f/4.9
  • Primary: 12MP wide, f/1.5 aperture, 1.9μm
  • Secondary: 12MP ultra-wide, f/1.8 aperture
  • Tertiary: 12MP telephoto, 3x optical zoom, f/2.8
  • Quarternary: LIDAR camera
Front Camera(s) 40MP 12MP
Port(s) USB-C Lightning
Audio Stereo speakers Stereo speakers
Connectivity
  • 5G (mmWave)
  • Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) with 2×2 MIMO
  • Bluetooth 5.2
  • NFC
  • 5G (sub-6 GHz and mmWave)
  • Gigabit LTE with 4×4 MIMO and LAA
  • Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) with 2×2 MIMO
  • Bluetooth 5.0
Software One UI 4.1 over Android 12 iOS 15
Other Features
  • Single physical SIM in Korea and US; dual physical SIM in most other regions
  • S Pen included
Dual physical SIM or Dual eSIM support

Galaxy S22 Ultra vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: Hardware

  • Both phones are huge, which means great things like immersive screens and large batteries, but also bad things like uncomfortable in-hand feel
  • Gorgeous and brilliant display panels on both phones
  • Apple’s A15 Bionic is more powerful than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 if you really want to get technical

Design

Both the Galaxy S22 Ultra and iPhone 13 Pro Max are unapologetically big glass and metal slabs that will feel a bit unwieldy for most people. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit taller and thicker, but the iPhone 13 Pro Max is heavier and a hair wider, so they mostly even out in terms of mass.

However, both devices make design decisions of which I am not a fan. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has the usual curvy sides that anyone who’s used Android flagships will be used to, but its corners are pointy; the iPhone 13 Pro Max has rounded corners, but then the stainless steel sides of the phone are flat with hard corners. Either way, each phone jabs at my palm in ways almost any other recent releases do not. Using a case will probably fix this problem a bit, as the hard corners/sides will be softened a bit. But still, these are big and wide phones that most people will have a hard time using with one hand without needing to constantly readjust their grip.

iphone 13 pro max and galaxy s22 ultra screen galaxy s22 ultra iphone 13 pro max thickness

I have not dropped either device, and I don’t want to either. But I think the iPhone 13 Pro Max should be more likely to survive drops, because its frame is stainless steel and wide on all four sides, while the Galaxy S22 Ultra’s frame is aluminum, and gets quite narrow on the left and right sides due to the glass curvatures.

The Galaxy S22 Ultra and iPhone 13 Pro Max are unapologetically big glass and metal slabs that will feel a bit unwieldy for most people

Loud stereo speakers and IP68 water and dust resistance can be found in either device, as well as the usual flagship fares like wireless charging and reverse wireless charging. The Galaxy S22 Ultra uses newer Bluetooth connectivity standards (5.2) to the iPhone 13 Pro Max’s “just” 5.0, but I had no issues using wireless earbuds with either device. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has an excellent haptic engine, while many find the Galaxy S22 Ultra’s haptics a bit underwhelming.

Despite the small shortcomings, these phones are tip-top hardware built to the highest standards by the two biggest smartphone brands in the world.

Display

While these phones aren’t the most comfortable to hold, the positive trade-off you get in return is screen immersion. When it comes to displays, bigger is always better, and both panels here are absolutely brilliant: OLED screens (both manufactured by Samsung Displays) that get plenty bright with a refresh rate up to 120Hz. But the Galaxy S22 Ultra’s screen is superior — it packs more pixels, has a more versatile variable refresh rate implementation that can go from 1-120Hz, and gets a bit brighter at 1,750 nits to the iPhone’s 1,300 nits, Although these are wins mostly for the spec sheet, as users won’t be able to spot these differences in the real world unless they really tried to seek them out.

galaxy S22 ultra screen and iphone 13 pro max screen galaxy s22 ultra screen and iphone 13 pro max screen

However, there is one area in which Samsung’s screen is clearly superior — it’s only interrupted by a small hole punch instead of the giant iPhone notch. The iPhone 13 Pro Max display is still awesome in a vacuum, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra screen is just better in direct comparison.

Internals

The iPhone 13 Pro packs Apple’s 5nm A15 Bionic while the Galaxy S22 Ultra runs on either the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 or Exynos 2200. No matter which chip it’s up against, Apple’s A15 Bionic is the more powerful SoC according to benchmarks or 4K video rendering tests. How big is this gap depends on the Galaxy S22 Ultra variant.

I am, luckily, using the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 variant, where the performance gap between it and the A15 Bionic is small. In most real-world usages it feels every bit as fast and powerful as the A15 Bionic, with the only time I can see iPhone reigning supreme is when I’m editing and rendering 4K videos (even here, it’s an apples-to-oranges comparison, as I’m using different video editing apps). However, my colleague Adam Conway’s Exynos 2200 variant of the Galaxy S22 Ultra is noticeably inferior, with app launch lags and battery life issues noticed and documented in his testing. This means the iPhone 13 Pro Max is noticeably more powerful than the Exynos version of the Galaxy S22 Ultra.

The iPhone 13 Pro Max comes with 6GB of RAM while the Galaxy S22 Ultra packs either 8GB or 12GB. But as usual, the difference in RAM doesn’t matter much, as the iPhone 13 Pro feels every bit as speedy as the Galaxy S22 Ultra. I do notice if I open an older app on the iPhone 13 Pro Max, I have a wait a beat longer than on the Galaxy S22 Ultra, but it’s hardly anything worth making an issue about.

The Galaxy S22 Ultra features an in-display fingerprint scanner underneath its display panel. While this Qualcomm 3D Sonic Sensor Gen 2 is more reliable than the in-display scanners used in last year’s Galaxy S21 Ultra and overall gave me no issues, it is still noticeably slower, with a smaller scanning area, than the awesome Qualcomm 3D Sonic Max scanner seen in phones like the iQOO 9 Pro. Still, I much prefer having an in-display fingerprint scanner than Face ID, not just because I’d rather get more screen real estate, but also because my part of the world still wears masks daily. The next iOS update (15.4) is said to finally allow Face ID to work with masks, but currently, I still do not have this feature on my iPhones.

As for battery capacity, the iPhone 13 Pro Max’s 4,352 mAh is very large by iPhone standards but still smaller than the 5,000 mAh cell in the Galaxy S22 Ultra. I’ll talk more about performance and battery life in a separate section further down the article.

S Pen

There’s one bonus for the Galaxy S22 Ultra that the iPhone 13 Pro Max won’t be able to match — stylus support. Last year’s Galaxy S21 Ultra already featured this, but you had to buy the S Pen stylus separately. This year, the S Pen is built into the Galaxy S22 Ultra, making for a more seamless experience — not to mention a better value for consumers.

The S Pen can be used for obvious stylus things like jotting notes and sketching, but an arguably more convenient use case is the S Pen can act as a remote control for the Galaxy S22 Ultra. With S Pen in hand, you can control the camera app’s shutter button, or cycle through slides or photos all without touching the actual phone.

The S-Pen

I have never seen the S Pen as a necessity — it’s fun to have, but I don’t miss it when I’m using another phone. But considering the S Pen is included within the cost of the phone and doesn’t get in the way of the phone user experience, there can be no complaints. It’s an entirely extra feature that you get if you choose the Galaxy S22 Ultra over the iPhone 13 Pro Max.


Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: Cameras

  • The iPhone 13 Pro Max brings notable camera hardware improvements over last year, while the Galaxy S22 Ultra brings back last year’s camera hardware, but with some major software tweaks
  • Both phones have excellent main cameras that are neck and neck in terms of performance
  • The Galaxy S22 Ultra has obviously superior 10x zoom (and beyond), but the iPhone’s 3x telephoto is better than Samsung’s 3x telephoto

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max camera modules

In a turn of events from the previous iPhone vs Samsung (or iPhone vs any Android) battle, it is the iPhone that has received significant camera hardware upgrades this year while the challenger mostly made subtle, software-driven iterative upgrades.

The iPhone 13 Pro Max’s main camera gain both larger sensor size and faster aperture, while the ultra-wide gets an aperture boost and the zoom lens gained a longer 3x optical zoom. Getting a larger sensor size and faster aperture significantly improves light intake ability.

The Galaxy S22 Ultra’s cameras, meanwhile, use the exact same sensors as the Galaxy S21 Ultra’s, with the only hardware improvement coming via supposedly superior glass lenses. Instead, the bulk of Samsung’s camera improvements come via software algorithms and a new ISP, which, to be fair, can be claimed for the iPhone 13 Pro Max too.

But if you think this means the iPhone 13 Pro Max wins in the camera department easily — think again. The Galaxy S21 Ultra had a significantly better camera system than the iPhone 12 Pro Max last year, so it is Apple that has to make up for lost ground coming into this year’s battle.

Main camera, ideal lighting conditions

A few years ago, you could spot the differences between a Samsung Galaxy camera image and an iPhone image immediately, because Samsung’s cameras would dial up the contrast to an exaggerated, K-Pop style tune, while Apple would try to be as realistic as possible, sometimes to a fault as real-life can be a bit dull. That’s no longer the case, as the shots below are so close in quality, color reproduction, and dynamic range that it’s almost impossible to pick a winner. Both brands have decided to move a bit in the other’s direction: the Galaxy S22 Ultra’s cameras now pay more attention to accurate color representations, while the iPhone 13 Pro Max cameras definitely punches up colors more than before. Long story short: both of these phones have awesome main cameras that focus fast with shallow depth-of-field.

Galaxy S22 Ultra, main camera Galaxy S22 Ultra, main camera Galaxy S22 Ultra, main camera Galaxy S22 Ultra, main camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, main camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, main camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, main camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, main camera

If you do zoom in to pixel peep, you can see the Galaxy S22 Ultra’s shots are generally sharper and more detailed, partly because it packs 108 million pixels worth of information compared to the iPhone 13 Pro Max’s 12 million pixels, but also because Samsung tends to over-sharpen. You can clearly see more details but also a bit more noise.

S22 ultra, iphone 13 pro max collage 100% crops, S22 Ultra (left); iPhone 13 Pro Max (right).

Main camera, low to poor light conditions

At night, both phones have excellent light intake ability without resorting to night mode. In the below collection of shots, about half of them, neither phone needed night mode. In the latter two shots, both phones turned on night mode automatically, with the Galaxy S22 Ultra’s night mode taking a bit longer (2-3 seconds) compared to the iPhone 13 Pro Max’s 1-2 seconds.

Galaxy S22 Ultra, main camera Galaxy S22 Ultra, main camera Galaxy S22 Ultra, main camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, main camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, main camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, main camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, main camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, main camera Galaxy S22 Ultra, main camera Galaxy S22 Ultra, main camera Galaxy S22 Ultra, main camera Galaxy S22 Ultra, main camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, main camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, main camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, main camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, main camera

We can see that both cameras again churned out pretty similar shots in terms of dynamic range and color science. In a couple of the shots we can see the iPhone 13 Pro Max again suffers from exposing lights (the “mora” sign in the second to last shot), but otherwise all of these shots are excellent.

Ultra-wide and zoom cameras, ideal lighting conditions

Both the Galaxy S22 Ultra and the iPhone 13 Pro Max pack a 3x optical zoom lens, but Samsung’s flagship also adds a 10x Periscope zoom lens on top. It should be no surprise that the Galaxy S22 Ultra wins any zoom shots at 10x or beyond. In fact, the iPhone 13 Pro Max can only go up to 15x zoom while the Galaxy S22 Ultra can go up to 100x.

However, the iPhone 13 Pro Max’s 3x zoom lens seems superior to Samsung’s, as 3x shots are generally sharper. There’s also better color consistency between an iPhone 13 Pro’s 3x zoom and a 15x zoom, while the Galaxy S22 Ultra can see some noticeable color shifts between shots captured by the 3x lens and 10x lens.

Galaxy S22 Ultra, ultra-wide Galaxy S22 Ultra, 10x Galaxy S22 Ultra, 3x Galaxy S22 Ultra, 15x iPhone 13 Pro Max, ultra-wide iPhone 13 Pro Max, 10x iPhone 13 Pro Max, 3x iPhone 13 Pro Max, 15x

In this below set, we can see the iPhone’s 10x shot of the dog is heavily processed, while the Galaxy S22 Ultra’s 10x shot is cleaner. But again, if we compare the 3x shot, I think the iPhone 13 Pro Max’s shot is superior — pay attention to the details on the chair in front of the dog.

As for the ultra-wide shooters, both phones do very well during the daytime, although the iPhone’s shot exhibits more noise and artifact if you really nitpick.

Galaxy S22 Ultra, ultra-wide iPhone 13 Pro Max, ultra-wide

Ultra-wide and zoom cameras, low to poor lighting conditions

In less than ideal lighting conditions, both phones have to resort to night mode often, but the iPhone 13 Pro Max’s ultra-wide sees a bigger drop off in quality. It’s not that noticeable if you just look at the ultra-wide shot on a phone screen or on Instagram, but if you zoom in, you can see the iPhone 13 Pro ultra-wide shots are very soft.

But then Apple regains the lead in 3x zoom. I think by now we have seen enough to conclude that, for main cameras, it’s a very evenly matched battle. But the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more capable ultra-wide camera, while the iPhone 13 Pro Max has a better 3x telephoto zoom lens.

Galaxy S22 Ultra, ultra-wide Galaxy S22 Ultra, 3x iPhone 13 Pro Max, ultra-wide Galaxy S22 Ultra, ultra-wide Galaxy S22 Ultra, 3x iphone 13 pro ultra-wide iPhone 13 Pro Max, 3x 100% crops, Galaxy S22 Ultra (left); iPhone 13 Pro Max (right). 100% crops, Galaxy S22 Ultra (left); iPhone 13 Pro Max (right).

Both phones do a great job of maintaining color consistency across all three lenses, which most Chinese Android phones fail to do.

Galaxy S22 Ultra, ultra-wide Galaxy S22 Ultra, 1x Galaxy S22 Ultra, 3x iPhone 13 Pro Max, ultra-wide iPhone 13 Pro Max, 1x iPhone 13 Pro Max, 3x

Selfie camera

The iPhone 13 Pro Max’s selfie camera produces more natural selfies, while the Galaxy S22 Ultra will apply a layer of skin smoothing/whitening filter even if you did not ask for it. Whether this is a good thing or not depends on who you are. The Galaxy S22 Ultra’s exposure tends to be all over the place, as can be seen in samples below — some of which prioritized exposing my face properly and blowing out the background lights, while another shot exposed the light behind me but left my face in shadows.

Galaxy S22 Ultra, selfie camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, selfie camera Galaxy S22 Ultra, selfie camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, selfie camera Galaxy S22 Ultra, selfie camera iPhone 13 Pro Max, selfie camera Galaxy S22 Ultra, selfie camera

Video

The iPhone has long held the crown for the best smartphone camera for recording videos, but in the last year or so, that title has been seriously challenged by Android phone makers, including Samsung. During the day, I would argue the Galaxy S22 Ultra’s videos are neck and neck with the iPhone 13 Pro Max in terms of stabilization and dynamic range. I’d still give a slight edge to the iPhone for having fewer micro-jitters that happen when I take a step, and more seamless switching of the lenses mid-filming, but it is close.

In low light conditions, each phone trade wins: the iPhone 13 Pro Max’s main camera footage at night has noticeably better stabilization and better colors than the Galaxy S22 Ultra’s main camera; but Samsung’s flagship produces brighter, less noisy ultra-wide and selfie videos in low light conditions.


Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: Software

  • OneUI is much more optimized for the large screen than iOS
  • Ecosystem Play: The iPhone has better connectivity across Apple’s line of products than the Galaxy S22 Ultra does with Samsung’s
  • Samsung DeX and stylus support allow the Galaxy S22 Ultra to do more

This is the most subjective part of this comparison, as the biggest divide and separation factor between these two phones. The iPhone 13 Pro Max runs on iOS 15; the Galaxy S22 Ultra runs on Android 12 with OneUI 4.1.

There’s not much point in dwelling too much into the differences of iOS vs Android, do we? Everyone reading this far down here should know the fundamental differences, like how each OS handles notifications differently, or how Android can sideload apps while iOS cannot (well, iOS can sideload apps, just not as easily).

Instead let’s highlight software features specific to these two phones: Samsung’s OneUI is significantly better at taking advantage of the extra screen space. OneUI, even more than Android, can adapt itself to play nicely with small or large phone screens. For example, you can use a denser homescreen grid so you can fit more apps onto the screen; you can rotate the homescreen to landscape orientation; you can run two apps at once in split-screen mode or have one floating on top of another.

oneui screenshot oneui screenshot oneui screenshot oneui screenshot oneui screenshot

iOS, on the other hand, isn’t particularly optimized at all for the larger screen. iOS 15 runs exactly the same, whether on the 6.8-inch iPhone 13 Pro Max or the 5.4-inch iPhone 13 Mini. This means if you switch from a Mini to a Pro Max, you don’t get to see more information on the homescreen, just a larger version of the same information. The fact that the iPhone 13 Pro Max is the widest slab phone on the market yet can still only place four apps horizontally is absurd. App icons look comically large, with lots of wasted dead space between apps.

OneUI is significantly better at taking advantage of the extra screen space. iOS, on the other hand, does not.

If I sound like I’m too harsh on iOS, well that’s because I generally much prefer Android over iOS. However, there are some undeniably great things about iOS. Apps tend to look better on iOS than on Android because developers spend more time and effort building for iOS (there’s more money to be made there); AirDrop works seamlessly, while Android’s version (Nearby Share) is still a bit unreliable; and I personally love the ability to access my Mac’s desktop files directly on my iPhone (an iCloud subscription is needed for this). I need to reiterate the last sentence, as some readers have in the past mistaken that for just a simple cloud drive situation. On a Mac, the entire homescreen is a cloud drive, it’s connected at all times, so any file you leave there is accessible on any other iOS or Mac device. You don’t have to manually upload the files yourself to a cloud service first. It’s this level of seamlessness that makes the service easy to use.

Samsung’s trying to build similar connectivity, but it’s not as seamless or fast. “Nearby Share,” which is Android’s version of AirPlay, works okay, but is noticeably slower than AirDrop, the Galaxy S22 Ultra can sync up with Samsung laptops (or any other Windows PC for that matter) but connectivity can be hit or miss. Even when I set up a new Samsung Galaxy Watch with a Galaxy S22 Ultra, I must download Samsung’s wearable app and several plug-ins before they can connect. This process is much more streamlined when connecting Apple Watch to iPhone.

But still, there’s no denying this much: the Galaxy S22 Ultra can just do more, software-wise. There’s Samsung DeX, which can turn the Galaxy S22 Ultra into a full PC desktop-like setup if you connect to an external display (wired or wirelessly); and there’s built-in stylus support for the S Pen. There are simply more things you can do with a Galaxy S22 Ultra than an iPhone 13 Pro Max.


Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: General Performance

  • The A15 Bionic is more powerful on paper, but in the real world, it’s very hard to see any differences — these are both cutting-edge SoCs
  • Both phones can last all day for me — a very heavy user — but the iPhone 13 Pro Max can go longer
  • Great speakers on both phones

Again, I am using the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 variant of the Galaxy S22 Ultra, which, apparently, performs much better than the Exynos version. Still, the A15 Bionic inside the iPhone 13 Pro Max is more powerful, both in benchmarks and real-world performance — but the latter is only really noticeable when I do one specific task: render 4K videos. Otherwise, whether I’m juggling between a half dozen apps or playing graphically intensive games, I see no real gap in performance between the two. In fact, I think Galaxy S22 Ultra apps launch a split-second faster in general.

s22 ultra benchmarks iphone 13 pro max benchmarks s22 ultra benchmarks iphone 13 pro max benchmarks

Connectivity, cell reception, and other phone features like call quality are excellent for me in Hong Kong, although I live in a highly connected city. Still, I have used enough iPhones and Galaxy S phones in the past around the world to know these phones are reliable. Both of these are some of the better-connected phones, and they make sense for people who travel internationally than a localized smartphone with fewer network bands.

Both phones excel as media consumption machines too, thanks to their large screens and excellent stereo speakers. The iPhone’s sound output does sound a bit more full, but then its screen is interrupted by a notch while the Galaxy S22 Ultra display is almost entirely screen.


Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: Conclusion

It’s always hard coming to a hard conclusion for iPhone vs Android comparisons because for people who are fully immersed in the Apple ecosystem, it’s a big ask for them to pull out and switch (It’s not impossible, however: I use a Mac and iPad as my main computers but I use an Android phone most of the year). But let’s say for sake of this article, I must pick a “winner.”

In that case, I’d pick the Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it is simply a better value — and there are enticing Galaxy S22 Ultra deals to make the value proposition even better. Both of these phones have large, brilliant screens, tremendous processing power, and great cameras, but Samsung’s flagships go a bit further and do a bit more everywhere. It can zoom further; it has stylus support and a cost-included stylus built-in; its UI can transform into a desktop layout for larger screen use.

iPhone 13 Pro Max and Galaxy S22 Ultra

The iPhone 13 Pro Max does offer better battery life and more processing power, but both of these upgrades are marginal and won’t be felt in the real world much. The Galaxy S22 Ultra can already go a full day of heavy use, it doesn’t matter much to me that the iPhone 13 Pro Max can go another hour or two on top.

But as I said, for many, they have long decided to stick with iPhones — in that case, the iPhone 13 Pro Max is the biggest and the best that Apple has to offer. If you’re on the Android side, the same can be said about the Galaxy S22 Ultra too, with Snapdragon at least.

    Galaxy S22 Ultra
    The Galaxy S22 Ultra is the best of the best right now in the Android space, with the best screen, the best zoom camera, and an S Pen to boot!
    Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
    The iPhone 13 Pro Max is the biggest and baddest Apple has to offer in the mobile space. It's got the most powerful mobile SoC in the world and impressive cameras.

The post Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max: The best of Android takes on the best of iOS appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/zmGQsKL
via IFTTT

These apps turn the Galaxy S22’s hole-punch into a battery and notification indicator

The Samsung Galaxy S22 series has everything you would expect from a modern flagship smartphone: an incredible display, stellar cameras, and snappy performance. The front camera’s hole-punch design, however, can still come across as an eyesore to some people. Luckily, customization is a key feature that gives Android smartphones a leg up over their iOS counterparts. The modding community has come up with creative apps, such as Energy Ring and aodNotify, to repurpose the area around the camera hole to simulate a notification light or even a battery indicator. Both of these apps are now updated to support the Samsung Galaxy S22 lineup.

If you own a Galaxy S22, Galaxy S22 Plus, or Galaxy S22 Ultra, you should definitely check these apps out.

AodNotify: Use hole-punch to simulate notification LED

If you miss the good old physical notification LED, aodNotify has you covered. Created by XDA Senior Member Jawomo, the nifty app lets you simulate a notification LED dot in the status bar. As the name suggests, aodNotify seamlessly integrates itself with Samsung’s Always on Display feature to alert you of any incoming notifications. The integration part isn’t hardcoded though, as you can choose to show the notification light even without the Always on Display.

aodNotify notification led animation

Apart from simulating the notification LED, aodNotify lets you create customizable edge lighting effects to display a ring of light around the hole-punch. The app also offers a notification preview feature, through which you to check if you have received any notification without fully waking up your device.

Notification light - aodNotify (Free+, Google Play) →

Energy Ring: Battery indicator around hole punch

Next up is Energy Ring by XDA Recognized Developer jagan2. With this app, you can easily add a circle around the front camera lens on your Galaxy S22. There are a lot of customization options at your fingertips, such as configuring the width of the pixel area to be used around the camera cutout, switching the direction of depletion between clockwise, anti-clockwise, and bi-directional, changing colors on the basis of battery level, and more. You can further extend the capabilities of Energy Ring by installing the privacy indicator app named Access Dots from the same developer.

Energy Ring animation

Using in-app purchases, users can unlock the ability to add gradients or multi-colored rings around the hole-punch camera. The developer claims that Energy Ring does not eat your phone’s battery unnecessarily and has a negligible load on the CPU. Note that the Galaxy S22-specific calibration is still in the early access stage, so the app may be a little rough around the edges.

Energy Ring: Universal Edition (Free+, Google Play) →


Device and XDA Forum Link aodNotify Discussion Thread Enery Ring Discussion Thread
Samsung Galaxy S22 Click here Click here
Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus Click here Click here
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Click here Click here

Have you tried the apps out? What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

The post These apps turn the Galaxy S22’s hole-punch into a battery and notification indicator appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/ohNXgku
via IFTTT

These apps turn the Galaxy S22’s hole-punch into a battery and notification indicator

The Samsung Galaxy S22 series has everything you would expect from a modern flagship smartphone: an incredible display, stellar cameras, and snappy performance. The front camera’s hole-punch design, however, can still come across as an eyesore to some people. Luckily, customization is a key feature that gives Android smartphones a leg up over their iOS counterparts. The modding community has come up with creative apps, such as Energy Ring and aodNotify, to repurpose the area around the camera hole to simulate a notification light or even a battery indicator. Both of these apps are now updated to support the Samsung Galaxy S22 lineup.

If you own a Galaxy S22, Galaxy S22 Plus, or Galaxy S22 Ultra, you should definitely check these apps out.

AodNotify: Use hole-punch to simulate notification LED

If you miss the good old physical notification LED, aodNotify has you covered. Created by XDA Senior Member Jawomo, the nifty app lets you simulate a notification LED dot in the status bar. As the name suggests, aodNotify seamlessly integrates itself with Samsung’s Always on Display feature to alert you of any incoming notifications. The integration part isn’t hardcoded though, as you can choose to show the notification light even without the Always on Display.

aodNotify notification led animation

Apart from simulating the notification LED, aodNotify lets you create customizable edge lighting effects to display a ring of light around the hole-punch. The app also offers a notification preview feature, through which you to check if you have received any notification without fully waking up your device.

Notification light - aodNotify (Free+, Google Play) →

Energy Ring: Battery indicator around hole punch

Next up is Energy Ring by XDA Recognized Developer jagan2. With this app, you can easily add a circle around the front camera lens on your Galaxy S22. There are a lot of customization options at your fingertips, such as configuring the width of the pixel area to be used around the camera cutout, switching the direction of depletion between clockwise, anti-clockwise, and bi-directional, changing colors on the basis of battery level, and more. You can further extend the capabilities of Energy Ring by installing the privacy indicator app named Access Dots from the same developer.

Energy Ring animation

Using in-app purchases, users can unlock the ability to add gradients or multi-colored rings around the hole-punch camera. The developer claims that Energy Ring does not eat your phone’s battery unnecessarily and has a negligible load on the CPU. Note that the Galaxy S22-specific calibration is still in the early access stage, so the app may be a little rough around the edges.

Energy Ring: Universal Edition (Free+, Google Play) →


Device and XDA Forum Link aodNotify Discussion Thread Enery Ring Discussion Thread
Samsung Galaxy S22 Click here Click here
Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus Click here Click here
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Click here Click here

Have you tried the apps out? What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

The post These apps turn the Galaxy S22’s hole-punch into a battery and notification indicator appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/ohNXgku
via IFTTT

samedi 12 mars 2022

ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO Review: A premium cooler with excellent cooling performance

Having used the ROG Ryujin II 360 for my primary build with an Intel Core i9-12900K, and RTX 2080 Super, I can safely say that this AIO offers excellent cooling performance. I was able to get through even the most demanding workloads without any issues and the operating temperatures were well under acceptable limits. The CPU was idling at around 25°C and was comfortably sitting under 80°C, even under heavy load.

In addition to the reliable cooling performance, the Ryujin II 360 also offers plenty of other exciting features that are worth checking out. As you can see, the 3.5-inch display on top of the CPU water block can be configured to show custom animations, useful CPU metrics, and more. Notably, you also get three high-quality Noctua fans for quiet operation. These fans help keep the overall noise output to a bare minimum, although the cooler tends to be a little loud when the CPU is pushed to its limits.

Add an RGB controller to the mix along with a 6-years warranty, you’re looking at a highly reliable AIO that delivers impressive performance and good customization. If all that sounds good to you then I highly recommend you continue reading to know more about the Ryujin II 360 AIO’s performance and features in detail. But long story short, I think the ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 would be a great choice to cool a high-performance CPU inside a high-end enthusiast PC.

    ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO
    The ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 is an excellent AIO that offers impressive cooling performance and plenty of good features. It's a little on the expensive side, so we think it's more suited for high-end enthusiast builds.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:


Navigate this review:

ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO: Pricing & Availability

  • The ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 is available to purchase now for around $310.

The ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 was launched alongside the first batch of the unlocked Alder Lake desktop parts. This particular AIO is readily available on the market right now for around $310. You can follow our buying link to find the best price for it online right now. ASUS also has a smaller 240mm version of this AIO called the Ryujin II 240. That’s more suitable for slightly less powerful chips, but the smaller form-factor will fit inside more PC cases. Not to mention, the smaller cooler will also cost you slightly less. The Ryujin II 240 would be our pick if we were to use some other Alder Lake chips like, say, the 12600K, the 12700, or more.

ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO: Specifications

Before we take a detailed look at the cooler itself and all the features it has to offer, let’s quick glance over the specifications:

Specification ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO
CPU Socket
  • Intel: LGA 1700, 1200, 115x, 2011, 2011-3, 2066
  • AMD: AM4, TR4
LCD Display 3.5″ Full-Color LCD
Radiator 360mm
Radiator Dimensions 121 x 394 x 27 mm
Water block Dimension 78.15 x 87.5 x 81 mm
Fan
  • Noctua NF-F12 InductrialPPC 2000 PWM Fan
  • 3 x Fan Slots (120mm)
  • 120 x 120 x 25 mm
  • 450 – 2000 RPM +/- 10%
  • 3.94 mmH2O
  • 71.6 CFM / 121.8 m3h
  • 29.7 dB(A)
  • PWM/ DC
Warranty 6 Years

Looking at the specifications, I think it’s safe to say that the bundled Noctua fan kit sets this cooler apart from the competition. The fully customizable 3.5-inch LCD panel is also a great addition. We’ll talk a bit more about both of those things a bit later in this review. Another thing to note about this particular AIO is that it’s compatible with the new LGA1700 CPU socket for 12th gen Intel Alder Lake CPUs. Notably, you also get a 6-years manufacturer warranty, sot that’s awesome too.


ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO: Design & build quality

  • Comes with a fully customizable 3.5-inch LCD.
  • Supports LGA1700 CPU socket with included mounting kit.
  • Comes with a pre-applied thermal paste (our review unit was used sample, so it didn’t have it).

When it comes to the design, I think the CPU water block makes it look really unique in the AIO space. The fact that it has a 3.5-inch LCD makes it better than a lot of other AIO coolers out there. The Gigabyte Waterforce X360 cooler that we reviewed not too long ago, also had a fully customizable display. That one, however, was quite small in comparison. This display is bigger, letting you glance over a lot more info and allowing you to customize it with images and GIFs of your choice.

ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO waterblock and 360mm radiator ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO copper plate ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO waterblock

You can use the ASUS Armory Crate software to easily customize this panel. I was able to get the cooler to show this neat little GIF image with almost little to no effort whatsoever. You can also choose to select a bunch of preset images or display some important metrics including the CPU temperature. But one thing I wanted to highlight about the cooler is that it’s got a massive water block. It’s definitely way larger than a lot of other Asetek 7 AIOs that are out there. While I didn’t have any clearance issues, you may have some trouble while installing it on your motherboard. I recommend removing the RAM modules to create some space temporarily before trying to install the cooler.

Installing the AIO, otherwise, is a fairly simple task. I didn’t face any issues while getting this up and running on the ASUS TUF Gaming Z690-Plus WiFi D4 motherboard. The tubes are also flexible enough to be adjusted according to the orientation of the water block. The length of the tubes is also adequate for most PC cases. Just make sure your PC case of choice has space to mount a 360mm radiator, preferably on the top. I DO NOT recommend buying this AIO if you’re working with a small-sized mini-ITX case. ASUS also makes a 240mm version of this cooler, which I think might be a better fit for SFF cases.

The ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO, as I mentioned earlier, is bundled with three high-quality Noctua NF-F12 InductrialPPC 2000 PWM fans. These 120mm fans are responsible to move the air through the radiator to regulate the temperatures. It’s worth pointing out that these aren’t RGB-enabled fans, so you’ll have to find other sources of RGB lights for your PC case. ASUS is also bundling its ROG Fan Controller to make it easier for you to install all the fans. Noctua, in case you don’t know, is known for its cooling solutions that deliver impressive results while keeping the overall noise output low. These fans definitely live up to the expectations and were generally very quiet throughout my usage. I’d say they were quieter than the fans that were bundled with the Aorus Waterforce X360 AIO.

ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO Noctua 120mm fans


ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO: Cooling Performance

  • Offers great cooling performance overall.
  • A good option to consider for high-end rigs with, say, a Core i9-12900K.

In order to test the ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO, I paired it with an Intel Core i9-12900K. I also tested it with the Intel Core i7-12700, although I’ll only be adding the benchmark numbers recorded with the 12900K in this review in order to be able to draw a comparison with one of our previous tests. I used HWInfo64 to track the real-time core temperature readings, CPU speed, and a couple of readings to see how the CPU performed at any given point in time.

The ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 managed to keep the 12900K cool at times. I was able to record an idle temperature of around 25°C, which is just about what you’d expect from a high-end cooler. Even under heavy load, the Ryujin II 360 managed to keep the 12900K under 85°C. I logged the CPU temperature both while gaming as well as while running some benchmarking applications. While gaming, for instance, the avg temperature of the CPU was about 45°C to 50°C.

Here’s a quick look at a CPU temperature graph while I was running some stress tests:

ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 12900K cooling chart

Even under overclocked conditions, the Core i9-12900K peaked at 56°C while gaming, so it’s safe to say that the Ryujin II 360 was able to keep up the thermal output of the high-end Alder Lake part. Here’s a quick look at the temperature readings to give you a better understanding of the kind of performance you can expect from this AIO:

Test Recorded Peak Core Temperature
(ROG Ryujin II 360)
Recorded Peak Core Temperature
(Gigabyte Aorus Waterforce X360)
Idle 25°C 23°C
Gaming 46°C 43°C
Gaming (Overclocked) 56°C 54°C
Stress 86°C 79°C

ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO: Is it worth buying?

If you are in the market to buy an AIO cooler for your new high-end gaming PC build, then you’re very likely to stumble upon the ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO. If you are planning to use this AIO to cool some high-performance chips like the Core i9-12900K or the AMD Ryzen 5950X, then you won’t be disappointed. The Ryujin II 360 is a stellar AIO that can tame the thermal output of these high-end chips with ease.

Who should buy the ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO?

  • Those who are looking for a reliable cooler for high-end CPUs
  • Those who want to customize the CPU water block with images, GIFs, etc.

Who should not buy the ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO?

  • Don’t buy it if you are working with a small PC case with not enough space for a 360mm radiator.
  • Don’t buy this AIO for a mid-range CPU. Consider buying the smaller 240mm version of this AIO instead.

Well, that wraps up my review of the ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO. If you are looking for alternatives, then you can also consider buying the Gigabyte Aorus Waterforce X360 AIO that’s slightly more affordable. You can check out our Aorus Waterforce X360 review to learn more about the other cooler and see how it compares against the Ryujin II 360 when it comes to the feature set. There’s no shortage of AIO coolers on the market and you can find a lot more options in our collection of the best liquid coolers out there.

    ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO
    The ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 is an excellent AIO that offers impressive cooling performance and plenty of good features. It's a little on the expensive side, so we think it's more suited for high-end enthusiast builds.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

The post ASUS ROG Ryujin II 360 AIO Review: A premium cooler with excellent cooling performance appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/aL1PM2x
via IFTTT

HP Spectre x360 16 review: It’s a lot of computer, but it’s awesome

If you’re looking for a big-screen convertible, the HP Spectre x360 16 is hands down your best option. And I’m not just saying that because big-screen convertibles are incredibly rare. Indeed, Dell made an XPS 15 2-in-1 once…once. With this year’s Spectre x360, HP made the screen even bigger with a 16-inch 16:10 panel instead of a 15.6-inch display.

Most importantly, that big display is OLED, at least on higher-end models. And while the screen is visually appealing, so is the chassis. While HP has abandoned the gem-cut edges of previous models, the Spectre x360 still has the prettiest design in its class. That’s all topped off with a great keyboard.

Ultimately, it comes down to if you want a machine like this. If you’re looking at 16-inch convertibles, you’re in the right place. If you’re looking for great battery life, something lightweight, and so on, I do highly recommend the Spectre x360 14.

    HP Spectre x360 16
    The HP Spectre x360 is always one of the best convertibles around, with a beautiful design and great experiences. It's always a great choice, and this one is for if you want a big laptop.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

Navigate this review:

HP Spectre x360 16: Pricing and availability

  • The HP Spectre x360 16 currently starts at $1,429.99.

The HP Spectre x360 16 was announced late last year, but it wasn’t available until more recently. As of now, all configurations are available for purchase. At the time of announcement, the starting price was $1,639, but on HP.com right now, it starts at $1,429.99.

That model comes with an Intel Core i7-11390H, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, and a 3,072×1,920 touchscreen. The model that HP sent over for review is a bit more specced out though. It has the same Core i7 and 16GB RAM, but the SSD is bumped up to 1TB. This unit also has a 3,840×2,400 OLED display, and it has added dedicated graphics in the form of an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050. It comes in at $2,119.99.

Totally specced out, you can get it with 32GB RAM and a 2TB SSD. The total price is $2,859.99.

HP Spectre x360 16: Specs

CPU Intel Core i7-11390H
GPU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU (4 GB)
Body 14.09 x 9.66 x 0.78 in, 4.45 lb
Display 16″ diagonal, UHD+ (3840 x 2400), OLED, multitouch-enabled, UWVA, anti-reflection, Low Blue Light, 400 nits
Memory 16 GB DDR4-3200 MHz RAM
Storage 1 TB PCIe NVMe TLC M.2 SSD
Battery 6-cell, 83 Wh Li-ion polymer
Keyboard Full-size, backlit, nightfall black keyboard
Webcam HP True Vision 5MP IR camera with camera shutter, temporal noise reduction and integrated dual array digital microphones
Connectivity Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (2×2) and Bluetooth 5.2 combo (Supporting Gigabit data rate)
Audio Audio by Bang & Olufsen; Quad speakers; HP Audio Boost
Ports 2 Thunderbolt 4 with USB4 Type-C 40Gbps signaling rate (USB Power Delivery, DisplayPort 1.4, HP Sleep and Charge)
1 SuperSpeed USB Type-A 10Gbps signaling rate (HP Sleep and Charge)
1 HDMI 2.0b
1 AC smart pin
1 headphone/microphone combo
1 microSD media card reader
Color Nightfall Black
Material Aluminum
OS Windows 10 Home
Price $2,119.99

Design: The HP Spectre x360 16 is a lot more subtle than its predecessors

  • It’s still pretty, but it’s definitely toned down by a lot.

I’ve been saying for years that the HP Spectre x360 is the sexiest laptop on the market for years now, and while it’s probably still true, the new Spectre x360 16 is significantly less sexy than its predecessors. I think that was intentional, to be honest.

Sharp corners have been replaced by curves, and accents are more subtle.

Previous generations had gem-cut edges and two-tone designs, mixing Nightfall Black with copper accents around the edges, hinges, and touchpad. They were the only Windows PCs that I really felt stood out from the crowd, and they felt great to pull out of a bag in front of people. They were works of art.

The sharp corners have been replaced by curves, and those strong accents are a lot more subtle. On the Nightfall Black model that HP sent me, there’s a thin, silver line that wraps around the border where the curved top and bottom meet. It’s still a pretty machine, but it’s not nearly as flashy.

Top down view of HP Spectre x360 16

It also comes in blue, but both colors come with silver accents this time. There’s no silver color, which is a decision that I’m a fan of. There was a year or two when there was no Spectre x360 13 didn’t have a silver color, and I was so upset when it was brought back. I say, death to silver laptops. We have enough of them.

Side view of HP Spectre x360 16

Moving on, there are plenty of ports, as you’d expect from a 16-inch laptop. On the left side, there’s a USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A port and an HDMI 2.0b port. On the flattened rear corner, there’s a 3.5mm audio jack.

Side view of HP Spectre x360 16

On the right side, there are two Thunderbolt 4 ports, one of which is on the rear corner. The purpose of the flattened corner is that the cable is facing away from you, but you can still fold the display back into tablet mode. As you’d expect, you can use any one of these ports for connecting dual 4K monitors, an external GPU if that RTX 3050 isn’t enough when you’re at home, and so on.

There’s also a power port on the right side, since this machine comes with a 135W charger and that’s more than Power Delivery could handle. The USB Type-C ports do charge, albeit slowly while the machine is in use.

Again, the HP Spectre x360 16 is a beautiful machine, but not as much so as its predecessors. I do think that it was toned down on purpose, for what it’s worth. For my personal opinion, I wish it wasn’t, and this design was used for the Envy brand instead.

Display: It comes with that sweet OLED, and it’s bigger

  • The display is big and beautiful, with a 4K OLED option.
  • There’s a 5MP webcam, which is one of the best around in a laptop.

The HP Spectre x360 16 comes with a, you guessed it, 16-inch display, which is a bit larger than the 15.6-inch screen on the unit it’s replacing. There’s actually even more of a size difference than it sounds like, because the aspect ratio is 16:10 instead of 16:9, and the 16-inch size is measured diagonally. It’s taller, and when a rectangle is measured diagonally, the surface area gets larger the closer you get to a square.

Close up of laptop display

There are three options for the display, two of which are 3,072×1,920. The one I’m reviewing, however, is 3,840×2,400, and it’s OLED. That means that you get true blacks and vibrant colors. The OLED screen is truly a delight to use.

HP Display Control adjusts colors to take OLED to the next level.

Also, if you’re worried about the colors being too vibrant, there’s a built-in app called HP Display Control. This lets you optimize the colors for photo and video editing, web, printing, or you can just leave it on the default, which is optimized for vibrant colors. You can also have it apply a color profile based on which app you’re using.

HP Spectre x360 16 Display Test results

In my testing, the screen supported 100% sRGB, 89% NTSC, 91% Adobe RGB, and 99% P3. These results are about as good as it gets. It’s an excellent screen for creators.

HP Spectre x360 16 Display Test results

Brightness maxed out at 390.5 nits, which is fine since this really isn’t the type of machine you’ll be using in direct sunlight a lot. The contrast ratio is about as high as it goes, because that’s the nature of OLED.

Close up of HP Spectre x360 16 webcam

The Spectre x360 16 has narrow bezels on all sides, but HP left a little bit extra space on top because it’s actually using a good webcam. It’s a 5MP webcam that records 1080p video; there’s an IR camera for facial recognition as well. And yes, 1080p video only requires 2.1MP, but this gives the camera room to move around. It has AI features like the ability to focus on you, so if you move, the camera can follow you. It’s pretty great.

The HP Spectre x360 has one of the best webcams in a laptop.

When I think of the premium laptop market, the big two products that cross my mind are the HP Spectre x360 and Dell XPS. It’s worth noting that Dell is not doing this. Dell’s entire XPS lineup still uses HD cameras. Even with Intel’s new Evo spec recommending FHD cameras, the new Dell XPS 13 Plus packs a 0.9MP sensor. Of course, HP hasn’t refreshed its Spectre x360 14 yet either.

Keyboard: As you’d expect, it’s a spacious deck for a premium keyboard

  • It’s a solid keyboard, including buttons that you’d normally find on the sides like power, camera guard, and the fingerprint sensor.

HP makes excellent keyboards for its premium laptops, and the Spectre x360 16 is no different. It’s comfortable, it’s accurate, and like the rest of the laptop, it’s pretty.

Top down view of HP Spectre keyboard

As you can see from the image, HP went with its recent design of having all buttons on the keyboard. That includes a power button, a camera guard button, and even a fingerprint sensor.

Close up of camera button on keyboard

The camera guard is about what you’d expect. You press the button and you’ll see something blocking the sensor. It also disconnects the camera internally. That means that if you have that pressed, you’ll log into a call and it will say that there’s no camera detected. Actually, when HP first introduced the camera guard, it didn’t have a physical blocker at all, only disconnecting it internally, but I guess for a feature based on distrust, that physical barrier was needed.

Note that when the camera is disconnected, you won’t even see it in Device Manager.

Angled view of HP Spectre touchpad

The entire Spectre x360 lineup does use Microsoft Precision touchpads, which is a good thing. For every other brand, it goes without saying, but HP was one of the last holdouts on that. It made the switch a few years ago, but it’s still worth mentioning.

Normally for a touchpad like this, I’d say I wish it was a little bit bigger, but I don’t think that’s even possible despite the fact that there seems to be extra real estate. Indeed, whenever I see extra space on the top or bottom of a touchpad, I wonder why the touchpad isn’t larger. But since the front is curved in the way that it is, I suppose it’s as big as it could be.

Performance: The HP Spectre x360 16 comes with Tiger Lake H35 processors and RTX graphics

  • The Tiger Lake H35 CPU and RTX 3050 graphics, combined with the beautiful OLED display, make the HP Spectre x360 16 a perfect laptop for creators.
  • Battery life is solid for the powerful hardware, but it can struggle, something that’s normal for machines with dedicated graphics.

The HP Spectre x360 16 comes with an Intel Core i7-11390H, which is standard across all models. What’s not standard is graphics, which is Iris Xe in the base model and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 in higher end units. HP sent me the latter, and it comes with 16GB RAM.

HP Spectre x360 16 in tent mode

This is a machine that’s aimed at creators. As someone who just bought a new camera, I did a lot of editing in Adobe Lightroom Classic and Photoshop, and the Spectre handled my batch exports in Lightroom like a champ. Like I said, this machine is a delight to use. Aside from editing photos, it’s a convertible, so you can use it to draw on the nice big display.

The 35W CPU and RTX graphics make the HP Spectre x360 16 perfect for creators.

Personally, I’m a big fan of the Core i7-11390H, a quad-core 35W CPU. Traditionally, the H-series has been 45W, and in recent years, it’s had more cores. But with 11th-gen, Intel introduced a new 35W tier, with a lineup that’s similar to the U-series but jacked up to 35W. Tiger Lake H35 isn’t as powerful as H45, but I really think that’s fine. It’s not a gaming PC or a mobile workstation. It’s a creator laptop, and not using too much power means better battery life.

Speaking of battery life, I was able to get nearly five hours on this machine. That’s really good when you consider the powerful internals and the high-resolution OLED display. However, it was closer to three and a half hours if I don’t let Windows switch to battery saver in the final 20%. This is all with real-world usage, meaning working in a Chromium browser (Vivaldi), Photoshop, Lightroom, OneNote, Slack, etc.

Remember, while the OLED option is definitely the most beautiful one, the 3K option will save you some battery life. So will things like switching the power slider in Windows to lower options.

For performance benchmarks, I used PCMark 10, 3DMark, VRMark, Geekbench, and Cinebench.

HP Spectre x360 16
Core i7-11390H, RTX 3050
Surface Laptop Studio
Core i7-11370H, RTX A2000
Dell XPS 15 9510
Core i7-11800H, RTX 3050 Ti
PCMark 10 5,254 5,573 5,988
3DMark: Time Spy 3,604 5,075 4,801
Geekbench 1,604 / 5,208 1,546 / 5,826 1,538 / 7,514
Cinebench 1,570 / 5,098 1,504 / 6,283 1,491 / 9,399

Note that the Dell XPS 15 is the only one of the three that uses a 45W H-series processor. That’s why it gets better multi-core scores on CPU tests.

Who should buy the HP Spectre x360 16?

The HP Spectre x360 16, like all Spectre laptops, is a phenomenal device that’s totally worth buying. Of course, it’s not for everyone.

Who should but the HP Spectre x360 16?

  • Creators who want something stylish.
  • People who want a convertible, but also want a big screen.

Who should not buy the HP Spectre x360 16?

  • Customers who prioritize portability and want something lightweight.
  • Productivity-focused users that would be better served by something with a U-series processor.

The bottom line is that this is a phenomenal laptop for creators and artists. That’s also why I say it’s not for everyone. The HP Spectre x360 16 is a lot of computer. If you’re looking for something that weighs three pounds and is comfortable to carry around, this isn’t it. This thing is big, weighing over four pounds. It’s awesome, but you have to want that particular kind of awesome.

The post HP Spectre x360 16 review: It’s a lot of computer, but it’s awesome appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/J7q54tw
via IFTTT

HP Spectre x360 16 review: It’s a lot of computer, but it’s awesome

If you’re looking for a big-screen convertible, the HP Spectre x360 16 is hands down your best option. And I’m not just saying that because big-screen convertibles are incredibly rare. Indeed, Dell made an XPS 15 2-in-1 once…once. With this year’s Spectre x360, HP made the screen even bigger with a 16-inch 16:10 panel instead of a 15.6-inch display.

Most importantly, that big display is OLED, at least on higher-end models. And while the screen is visually appealing, so is the chassis. While HP has abandoned the gem-cut edges of previous models, the Spectre x360 still has the prettiest design in its class. That’s all topped off with a great keyboard.

Ultimately, it comes down to if you want a machine like this. If you’re looking at 16-inch convertibles, you’re in the right place. If you’re looking for great battery life, something lightweight, and so on, I do highly recommend the Spectre x360 14.

    HP Spectre x360 16
    The HP Spectre x360 is always one of the best convertibles around, with a beautiful design and great experiences. It's always a great choice, and this one is for if you want a big laptop.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

Navigate this review:

HP Spectre x360 16: Pricing and availability

  • The HP Spectre x360 16 currently starts at $1,429.99.

The HP Spectre x360 16 was announced late last year, but it wasn’t available until more recently. As of now, all configurations are available for purchase. At the time of announcement, the starting price was $1,639, but on HP.com right now, it starts at $1,429.99.

That model comes with an Intel Core i7-11390H, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, and a 3,072×1,920 touchscreen. The model that HP sent over for review is a bit more specced out though. It has the same Core i7 and 16GB RAM, but the SSD is bumped up to 1TB. This unit also has a 3,840×2,400 OLED display, and it has added dedicated graphics in the form of an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050. It comes in at $2,119.99.

Totally specced out, you can get it with 32GB RAM and a 2TB SSD. The total price is $2,859.99.

HP Spectre x360 16: Specs

CPU Intel Core i7-11390H
GPU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU (4 GB)
Body 14.09 x 9.66 x 0.78 in, 4.45 lb
Display 16″ diagonal, UHD+ (3840 x 2400), OLED, multitouch-enabled, UWVA, anti-reflection, Low Blue Light, 400 nits
Memory 16 GB DDR4-3200 MHz RAM
Storage 1 TB PCIe NVMe TLC M.2 SSD
Battery 6-cell, 83 Wh Li-ion polymer
Keyboard Full-size, backlit, nightfall black keyboard
Webcam HP True Vision 5MP IR camera with camera shutter, temporal noise reduction and integrated dual array digital microphones
Connectivity Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (2×2) and Bluetooth 5.2 combo (Supporting Gigabit data rate)
Audio Audio by Bang & Olufsen; Quad speakers; HP Audio Boost
Ports 2 Thunderbolt 4 with USB4 Type-C 40Gbps signaling rate (USB Power Delivery, DisplayPort 1.4, HP Sleep and Charge)
1 SuperSpeed USB Type-A 10Gbps signaling rate (HP Sleep and Charge)
1 HDMI 2.0b
1 AC smart pin
1 headphone/microphone combo
1 microSD media card reader
Color Nightfall Black
Material Aluminum
OS Windows 10 Home
Price $2,119.99

Design: The HP Spectre x360 16 is a lot more subtle than its predecessors

  • It’s still pretty, but it’s definitely toned down by a lot.

I’ve been saying for years that the HP Spectre x360 is the sexiest laptop on the market for years now, and while it’s probably still true, the new Spectre x360 16 is significantly less sexy than its predecessors. I think that was intentional, to be honest.

Sharp corners have been replaced by curves, and accents are more subtle.

Previous generations had gem-cut edges and two-tone designs, mixing Nightfall Black with copper accents around the edges, hinges, and touchpad. They were the only Windows PCs that I really felt stood out from the crowd, and they felt great to pull out of a bag in front of people. They were works of art.

The sharp corners have been replaced by curves, and those strong accents are a lot more subtle. On the Nightfall Black model that HP sent me, there’s a thin, silver line that wraps around the border where the curved top and bottom meet. It’s still a pretty machine, but it’s not nearly as flashy.

Top down view of HP Spectre x360 16

It also comes in blue, but both colors come with silver accents this time. There’s no silver color, which is a decision that I’m a fan of. There was a year or two when there was no Spectre x360 13 didn’t have a silver color, and I was so upset when it was brought back. I say, death to silver laptops. We have enough of them.

Side view of HP Spectre x360 16

Moving on, there are plenty of ports, as you’d expect from a 16-inch laptop. On the left side, there’s a USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A port and an HDMI 2.0b port. On the flattened rear corner, there’s a 3.5mm audio jack.

Side view of HP Spectre x360 16

On the right side, there are two Thunderbolt 4 ports, one of which is on the rear corner. The purpose of the flattened corner is that the cable is facing away from you, but you can still fold the display back into tablet mode. As you’d expect, you can use any one of these ports for connecting dual 4K monitors, an external GPU if that RTX 3050 isn’t enough when you’re at home, and so on.

There’s also a power port on the right side, since this machine comes with a 135W charger and that’s more than Power Delivery could handle. The USB Type-C ports do charge, albeit slowly while the machine is in use.

Again, the HP Spectre x360 16 is a beautiful machine, but not as much so as its predecessors. I do think that it was toned down on purpose, for what it’s worth. For my personal opinion, I wish it wasn’t, and this design was used for the Envy brand instead.

Display: It comes with that sweet OLED, and it’s bigger

  • The display is big and beautiful, with a 4K OLED option.
  • There’s a 5MP webcam, which is one of the best around in a laptop.

The HP Spectre x360 16 comes with a, you guessed it, 16-inch display, which is a bit larger than the 15.6-inch screen on the unit it’s replacing. There’s actually even more of a size difference than it sounds like, because the aspect ratio is 16:10 instead of 16:9, and the 16-inch size is measured diagonally. It’s taller, and when a rectangle is measured diagonally, the surface area gets larger the closer you get to a square.

Close up of laptop display

There are three options for the display, two of which are 3,072×1,920. The one I’m reviewing, however, is 3,840×2,400, and it’s OLED. That means that you get true blacks and vibrant colors. The OLED screen is truly a delight to use.

HP Display Control adjusts colors to take OLED to the next level.

Also, if you’re worried about the colors being too vibrant, there’s a built-in app called HP Display Control. This lets you optimize the colors for photo and video editing, web, printing, or you can just leave it on the default, which is optimized for vibrant colors. You can also have it apply a color profile based on which app you’re using.

HP Spectre x360 16 Display Test results

In my testing, the screen supported 100% sRGB, 89% NTSC, 91% Adobe RGB, and 99% P3. These results are about as good as it gets. It’s an excellent screen for creators.

HP Spectre x360 16 Display Test results

Brightness maxed out at 390.5 nits, which is fine since this really isn’t the type of machine you’ll be using in direct sunlight a lot. The contrast ratio is about as high as it goes, because that’s the nature of OLED.

Close up of HP Spectre x360 16 webcam

The Spectre x360 16 has narrow bezels on all sides, but HP left a little bit extra space on top because it’s actually using a good webcam. It’s a 5MP webcam that records 1080p video; there’s an IR camera for facial recognition as well. And yes, 1080p video only requires 2.1MP, but this gives the camera room to move around. It has AI features like the ability to focus on you, so if you move, the camera can follow you. It’s pretty great.

The HP Spectre x360 has one of the best webcams in a laptop.

When I think of the premium laptop market, the big two products that cross my mind are the HP Spectre x360 and Dell XPS. It’s worth noting that Dell is not doing this. Dell’s entire XPS lineup still uses HD cameras. Even with Intel’s new Evo spec recommending FHD cameras, the new Dell XPS 13 Plus packs a 0.9MP sensor. Of course, HP hasn’t refreshed its Spectre x360 14 yet either.

Keyboard: As you’d expect, it’s a spacious deck for a premium keyboard

  • It’s a solid keyboard, including buttons that you’d normally find on the sides like power, camera guard, and the fingerprint sensor.

HP makes excellent keyboards for its premium laptops, and the Spectre x360 16 is no different. It’s comfortable, it’s accurate, and like the rest of the laptop, it’s pretty.

Top down view of HP Spectre keyboard

As you can see from the image, HP went with its recent design of having all buttons on the keyboard. That includes a power button, a camera guard button, and even a fingerprint sensor.

Close up of camera button on keyboard

The camera guard is about what you’d expect. You press the button and you’ll see something blocking the sensor. It also disconnects the camera internally. That means that if you have that pressed, you’ll log into a call and it will say that there’s no camera detected. Actually, when HP first introduced the camera guard, it didn’t have a physical blocker at all, only disconnecting it internally, but I guess for a feature based on distrust, that physical barrier was needed.

Note that when the camera is disconnected, you won’t even see it in Device Manager.

Angled view of HP Spectre touchpad

The entire Spectre x360 lineup does use Microsoft Precision touchpads, which is a good thing. For every other brand, it goes without saying, but HP was one of the last holdouts on that. It made the switch a few years ago, but it’s still worth mentioning.

Normally for a touchpad like this, I’d say I wish it was a little bit bigger, but I don’t think that’s even possible despite the fact that there seems to be extra real estate. Indeed, whenever I see extra space on the top or bottom of a touchpad, I wonder why the touchpad isn’t larger. But since the front is curved in the way that it is, I suppose it’s as big as it could be.

Performance: The HP Spectre x360 16 comes with Tiger Lake H35 processors and RTX graphics

  • The Tiger Lake H35 CPU and RTX 3050 graphics, combined with the beautiful OLED display, make the HP Spectre x360 16 a perfect laptop for creators.
  • Battery life is solid for the powerful hardware, but it can struggle, something that’s normal for machines with dedicated graphics.

The HP Spectre x360 16 comes with an Intel Core i7-11390H, which is standard across all models. What’s not standard is graphics, which is Iris Xe in the base model and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 in higher end units. HP sent me the latter, and it comes with 16GB RAM.

HP Spectre x360 16 in tent mode

This is a machine that’s aimed at creators. As someone who just bought a new camera, I did a lot of editing in Adobe Lightroom Classic and Photoshop, and the Spectre handled my batch exports in Lightroom like a champ. Like I said, this machine is a delight to use. Aside from editing photos, it’s a convertible, so you can use it to draw on the nice big display.

The 35W CPU and RTX graphics make the HP Spectre x360 16 perfect for creators.

Personally, I’m a big fan of the Core i7-11390H, a quad-core 35W CPU. Traditionally, the H-series has been 45W, and in recent years, it’s had more cores. But with 11th-gen, Intel introduced a new 35W tier, with a lineup that’s similar to the U-series but jacked up to 35W. Tiger Lake H35 isn’t as powerful as H45, but I really think that’s fine. It’s not a gaming PC or a mobile workstation. It’s a creator laptop, and not using too much power means better battery life.

Speaking of battery life, I was able to get nearly five hours on this machine. That’s really good when you consider the powerful internals and the high-resolution OLED display. However, it was closer to three and a half hours if I don’t let Windows switch to battery saver in the final 20%. This is all with real-world usage, meaning working in a Chromium browser (Vivaldi), Photoshop, Lightroom, OneNote, Slack, etc.

Remember, while the OLED option is definitely the most beautiful one, the 3K option will save you some battery life. So will things like switching the power slider in Windows to lower options.

For performance benchmarks, I used PCMark 10, 3DMark, VRMark, Geekbench, and Cinebench.

HP Spectre x360 16
Core i7-11390H, RTX 3050
Surface Laptop Studio
Core i7-11370H, RTX A2000
Dell XPS 15 9510
Core i7-11800H, RTX 3050 Ti
PCMark 10 5,254 5,573 5,988
3DMark: Time Spy 3,604 5,075 4,801
Geekbench 1,604 / 5,208 1,546 / 5,826 1,538 / 7,514
Cinebench 1,570 / 5,098 1,504 / 6,283 1,491 / 9,399

Note that the Dell XPS 15 is the only one of the three that uses a 45W H-series processor. That’s why it gets better multi-core scores on CPU tests.

Who should buy the HP Spectre x360 16?

The HP Spectre x360 16, like all Spectre laptops, is a phenomenal device that’s totally worth buying. Of course, it’s not for everyone.

Who should but the HP Spectre x360 16?

  • Creators who want something stylish.
  • People who want a convertible, but also want a big screen.

Who should not buy the HP Spectre x360 16?

  • Customers who prioritize portability and want something lightweight.
  • Productivity-focused users that would be better served by something with a U-series processor.

The bottom line is that this is a phenomenal laptop for creators and artists. That’s also why I say it’s not for everyone. The HP Spectre x360 16 is a lot of computer. If you’re looking for something that weighs three pounds and is comfortable to carry around, this isn’t it. This thing is big, weighing over four pounds. It’s awesome, but you have to want that particular kind of awesome.

The post HP Spectre x360 16 review: It’s a lot of computer, but it’s awesome appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/J7q54tw
via IFTTT